This is a seminar on what and how people predict about upcoming words in sentences.
Every week, each student reads a paper (or a couple of short ones) and one of the students presents the paper and leads in-class discussions.
When: 12:15 - 13:45, Wednesday
**No class on 25th, October or on 1st, November!**
Where: C7 3 / Seminar room 1.12
** The classroom has changed from the original one**
Prerequisites: None. First couple of classes introduce background knowledge.
You MUST join the seminar Teams channel to be in this seminar. If you haven't join it here.
All comunications should be via Teams, but you can also contact me at nakamura@lst.uni-saarland.de if there is any issue about Teams.
In everyday life, we hear and read hundreds and thousands of utterances, and understand what they mean (including this website!). Since it is such a usual part of our life, we rarely realize what a complicated task it is, and how quickly and effortless we complete it. This might be all the more surprising given that computers with huge computational resources and with state-of-the-art models have yet to reach what humans can normally do. Why we humans are such experts of language processing, even we are equipped with only limited computational abilities?
Psycholinguists have argued that predictive processing is one key to solve this puzzle. That is, people use what they have already heard/read to facilitate processing of expected continuations. For example, when you hear "I would like to have some coffee with ...", you guess cream or sugar among other candidates are likely to follow, and you start processing them even before you hear them.
This course will explore the predictive processing in human sentence processing. We will focus on the process of identification of words, and explore how prediction is involved in it.
We will be asking following questions:
How people use contexts to make predictions about upcoming words?
Which information can be used for prediction and which cannot be?
How can we know what people are predicting and how much they are predicted?
Each student is expected to attend, prepare, for and participate in every class. Please communicate in advance with me if you have to miss a class. If you cannot do so due to an emergency, please communicate it as soon as you can.
Turn in assignments on time and fully completed.
Ask for help!
You can walk into my office at C7 1, Room 1.13 anytime during the office hours below. These are tentative slots and I will make an announcement on Teams if there is any change.
Tuesday at 15-16
Friday at 11-12
All online comunications from students or from instructors should be via Teams. You can also contact me at nakamura@lst.uni-saarland.de if there is any issue using Teams.
I recognize the importance of a diverse student body, and we are committed to fostering inclusive and equitable classroom environments. I invite you, if you wish, to tell us how you want to be referred to in this class, both in terms of your name and your pronouns (he/him, she/her, they/them, etc.). Keep in mind that the pronouns someone uses are not necessarily indicative of their gender identity. Additionally, it is your choice whether to disclose how you identify in terms of your gender, race, class, sexuality, religion, and dis/ability, among all aspects of your identity (e.g., should it come up in classroom conversation about our experiences and perspectives) and should be self-identified, not presumed or imposed. I will do my best to address and refer to all students accordingly, and I ask you to do the same for all of your fellows.
4 credits
75%: Presentation
15%: Discussion questions
10%: Active participation in discussion
7 credits
45%: Paper
40%: Presentation
10%: Discussion questions
5%: Active participation in discussion
See the evaluation guidelines for more details.
See the guidelines for the term paper here.
NOTE: These are tentative lists and would be updated in the coming couple of weeks. You are more than welcome to suggest a paper or a topic!
The PDF files of the papers can be found in the reading folder in the Discussion channel.
Verbs and arguments
Altmann & Kamide (1999): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027799000591
Kamide et al. (2003): http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X03000238
Discourse
Nieuwland & Van Berkum (2006): https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1098
Xiang & Kuperberg (2015): https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2014.995679
Negation
Fischler et al. (1983): https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1983.tb00920.x
Nieuwland & Kuperberg (2008): https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02226.x
Local coherence (vs Global, event coherence)
Nieuwland and Van Berkum (2005): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926641005001102
Metusalem et al. (2012): http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X12000034
Rabs et al. (2022): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23273798.2021.2022171
Argument roles
Chow et al. (2016): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23273798.2015.1066832
Liao et al. (2022): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X22000377
Meaning
Federmeier & Kutas (1999): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X99926608
Rabovsky et al. (2018): http://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-018-0406-4
Sound
(DeLong et al. (2005): https://www.nature.com/articles/nn1504)
Kutas & Hillyard (1984): https://www.nature.com/articles/307161a0
Staub et al. (2015): http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X15000236